Contemporary Outcomes after PCI in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Results from a large Multi-centre Australian Registry

Tuesday, May 21, 2019
Belmont Ballroom 2-3 (The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas)
David Blusztein, M.B.B.S. , Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
Sinjini Biswas , Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
Nick Andrianopoulos , Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Jeffrey Lefkovits , Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Andrew Ajani , Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Angela Brennan , Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Stephen Duffy , Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
William Chan , The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
David Clark , The Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
Melanie Freeman , Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia
Ernesto Oqueli , Ballarat Health Services, Melbourne, Australia
Christopher M Reid , Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Dion Stub , Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
David Eccleston , Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

Background:
Previous studies reported greater risk of cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) than in non-DM. Advances in diabetes management and PCI over the past decade such as sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors have shown reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events and may have improved outcomes in PCI patients with DM.

Methods:
We prospectively collected follow-up data on 20,393 patients in the Melbourne Interventional Group (MIG) Registry between 2005 and 2014. Patient, procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared by DM vs non-DM status.

Results:
Patients receiving PCI with DM were more likely to be female, obese (BMI >30 kg/m2), have left ventricular dysfunction and renal impairment (p <0.001). DM patients were more likely to receive drug-eluting stents and were less likely to receive bare-metal stents when compared to non-DM (p <0.001). There was a significant increased rate of death and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in all follow-up phases (in-hospital, 30-day and 12-month) in patients with DM (p <0.05). There was also a significantly increased rate of target vessel revascularisation (TVR) and myocardial infarction (MI) at 12-months in the DM group (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in stroke rates in-hospital (p =0.053) but at 12-months, DM patients had increased stroke rates (p =0.043).

DM (n=4984) Non-DM (n=15409) P
In-hospital Mortality (%) 2.7 2.0 0.004
In-hospital MACCE (%) 4.1 3.4 0.046
12-month Mortality (%) 5.5 3.5 <0.001
12-month MACCE (%) 14.8 10.5 <0.001
12-month TVR (%) 6.9 5.4 <0.001
12-month MI (%) 5.1 3.1 <0.001

Conclusions:
Despite advances in drug and device therapy over the past decade, patients with DM continue to experience increased mortality and MACCE in-hospital and at 12 months post-PCI compared to non-DM, with higher TVR and MI rates.